Started a [[pulse check]] on how we want to treat #Fediverse accounts that develop or use AI, pending consent mechanisms.

https://www.loomio.com/p/ZAPwzi6t/how-should-social-coop-react-to-accounts-that-use-ai-or-develop-ai-tools-in-the-fediverse-

I recommend we limit if necessary (when reported) but do not suspend. This allows people to inform their consent or dissent while leaving both options on the table for others.

In other news mods an account I want to talk to (and is not a Nazi or clear troll or anything that we have voted is bannable), and asked me to wait more than three weeks before they discuss my appeal and consider moving the account to just limit as I suggested (a corrective action with no downsides as I see it). 44 people out of 1.4k monthly actives are following them and might lose the connection if the suspend is not lifted by end of this month.

IMHO this is not ideal and we should collectively do better. I can't honestly recommend Social.Coop to people anymore until moderation practices improve in response times, transparency and alignment with voted policies.

I plan to update this thread as more comes to pass.

In other news mods an account I want to talk to (and is not a Nazi or clear troll or anything that we have voted is bannable), and asked me to wait more than three weeks before they discuss my appeal and consider moving the account to just limit as I suggested (a corrective action with no downsides as I see it). 44 people out of 1.4k monthly actives are following them and might lose the connection if the suspend is not lifted by end of this month.

IMHO this is not ideal and we should collectively do better. I can't honestly recommend Social.Coop to people anymore until moderation practices improve in response times, transparency and alignment with voted policies.

I plan to update this thread as more comes to pass.

Hollie boosted